The gap between what it would take to mitigate climate change—years of net negative carbon emissions, in a world where even *further lowering the rate of increase* in emissions may be politically impossible—and popular media coverage of the issue is staggering. Oh public editor!https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1212823074216857600 …
-
-
There's a particularly noxious kind of climate sophistry that comes from the fact that out "carbon budget" for a 2ºC warmer world is running out. The less of this arbitrary number is left, the bigger a proportion of it will be accounted for by trivial changes like flying less
Show this thread -
The climate change lobby has made a deal with the devil where they try to give consumers in wealthy countries a sense of agency and urgency by lying to them about what impact their individual decisions can have on climate change. This will rapidly politicize the rest of the issue
Show this thread -
The only way to avert severe climate change is to move the energy basis of the industrial economy off of fossil fuels within a small number of years. This point needs to be hammered home in the public conversation. There's no "yummy recipe" people can follow at home to fix this.
Show this thread -
Moreover, calling for ineffective lifestyle changes among urban consumers in ways that will hurt rural producers, in a country where those rural places are structurally overrepresented in government, will guarantee that climate becomes a third rail issue and we all roast together
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
Or: stop using crypto currency
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only one Democratic candidate sports expanding nuclear power. Forward thinking
@AndrewYang!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.