I wish the people saying I’m unqualified and reckless would give me the benefit of the doubt and consider the possibility that I know exactly what I’m doing and am simply malicious and evil.
-
-
Matt Blaze is a cryptologist. He is NOT an expert in election auditing, human-factor studies, or public policy, which is where many of the concerns with Ballot Marking Devices (BMDs) arise. People give his non-expert opinions on these issues undue weight.
-
He is a universally recognized expert in election security, which is why he gets called to testify before Congress on these matters and is frequently cited as an expert by the press. I don't understand why you are questioning his credentials, but you are simply wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because he said two months ago that BMDs were just a “sideshow.” If he’d correct that statement and clearly acknowledge that BMDs are one of the main problems that would be great. (He seems to be edging his way in that direction.) Please see my tweet.https://twitter.com/rjgeller/status/1198907522943291393 …
-
I stand by it. You might want to read the whole thing. BMDs are not the only, or even the worst, security risk in US elections. Or you could just continue to make up stuff about me (or raise more “questions” about my competence and integrity).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.