If you're working on quantum computing resistant cryptography, have you also considered time travel resistant cryptography? Or infinite energy availability resistance? Why stop with that first imaginary technology?
There's a clunky thing with whatever number of qubits that works as advertised. I find the hype annoying, too, but there seems no reason that basic research into quantum-resistant cryptographic methods shoud be considered pie in the sky
-
-
Research, sure, but actively moving people towards QC-resistant crypto *now* is utter snake oil. No current QC tech even approaches being useful for anything vs standard methods, and we could be decades from even crossing that point, let alone practical crypto breaks.
-
I liken QC to AI, because they now exist due to enormous amounts of VC applied to shifting the goalposts away from what people used to call QC and AI.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.