I don't see this as a bad thing. Flash is and always has been an augmentation of the web, not a part of it. Removing out-of-the-box support from the browser isn't getting rid of it, it simply moves the responsibility for it working back onto Adobe.
-
-
-
And considering its increasing irrelevance, it's an unnecessary cost for Google to maintain something that's used so little for indexable data. In fact, I'm (pleasantly) surprised they supported it for this long, and it's finally being phased out in the year of our lord 2019.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Remember when we used to have SEVERAL search engines including Lycos, Excite, AskJeeves, AltaVista, Infoseek, Northern Light, etc.? We need to do THAT again. Rather than complaining about being stuck with Google, Yahoo, Bing, and DuckDuckGo, let's make more search engines!
-
We have several search engines but they can't really compete with the results they give us.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well since they’ve effectively created the one browser engine to render it all. Meh. Call me when people make browsers that aren’t chrome.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.