There should be a database of cryptographic hashes for stupid ideas. But two good questions to ask when evaluating any mandated surveillance proposal are "does it acknowledge the existence of jurisdictions outside the US?" and "does it imply the perpetuation of a tech monopoly?"
-
-
Show this thread
-
The hard problem here is "people post enormous amounts of CSAM to Facebook and every other image sharing site." Solving it by mandating that Webkit's rendering engine ping a third-party database may not be the best solution to that problem.
Show this thread -
The most intelligent comment on the situation at the Stanford Internet Observatory summit came from
@mattblaze. We can't assume the all-mobile world with five tech giants we live in now is the future shape of the Internet. We've all lived through too many transformations.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I almost called it a "modest" proposal, and it is 'privacy-sensitive mass surveillance'. It also has 0 chance of flying, but that is OK: The point is that it would at least work but exceptional access won't.
-
The iron law of 2019 guarantees that the worst possible idea will make it into legislation, which is why it is a poor idea to publish this where you did. Also note that your proposal solves a completely different problem from exceptional access, and the two can easily coexist
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.