Let's remember that the US constitution stipulates impeachment for "high crimes and misdemeanors". If the President only commits high crimes, there's no way to impeach. You gotta also have some misdemeanors. I don't make up these rules.
-
-
Fairness also requires pointing out that these conversations are all being moved to an extra-secure server, in contradistinction to Hillary's emails. No wonder Republicans, who care deeply about the sanctity of classified communications, are loath to impeach.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Since Trump's Razor says the stupidest possible explanation is always true, it would be completely fitting if the thing that finally breaks the dam is the one time he goes after someone who is actually guilty of something
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
no offense to any legit Hunters out there but Hunter is such a son of a rich man name
-
I won't tell my cousin who's the son of a nuclear power plant engineer. Not many good male-coded names beginning with H and most sound like they belong to our (grand)parents' generation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Between the Trumps and the Bidens, Chelsea’s lack of achievement is an overlooked virtue in retrospect (tsk tsk Colin Powell).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gotta admit I don't understand why impeachment isn't based on the week 1 unconstitutional muslim ban, and the catalogue of corruption since. Seems very unprincipled for it to require some kind of political farce.
-
Because of the correct assessment that it would have failed in the Senate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.