4. The quantum blockchain is coming to the enterprise 5. Scientific calculators will still somehow cost $90 6. True aficionados will prefer the richer, warmer computation of classical CPUs 7. Policy decisions will be based on whatever Tom Friedman understands about linear algebra
-
-
Show this thread
-
8. Someone will get $100M from SoftBank to develop subquantum computing 9. Bay Area first dates about to get way more tedious 10. Those bastards killed Google Reader
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To pick up on what this tweet is not about: Did you see that story about Golf Digest helping to get a guy out of jail who had been wrongfully convicted of murder? It was quite something. https://www.secondcaptains.com/2018/09/28/episode-1278-how-golf-digest-solved-a-murder-the-man-who-served-27-years-for-a-crime-he-didnt-commit-connachts-temple-of-muldoon-lotta-hatred-building-in-leinster-second-round/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Quantum Supreme.
-
I’m holding out for Quantum Baby Love but I’ll settle for Quantum Stop in the Name of Love
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
4) The comfortably-indoor industry with self-important jargon like “advanced persistent threat” and “side channel attack” is going to add more dorky terms of art like ‘Classical Challenger’.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just don’t understand if they claim to have calculated a thing that takes 100,000 years (I don’t remember the real number) to calculate, how can anyone know it is correct?
-
There are plenty of problems that are extremely difficult to solve but easy to verify. A trivial example would be a preimage attack on a cryptographic hash function.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.