How did the Privacy Project come to publish six thousand words of cyberdrivel from an NSA lawyer? How did an editor let through "cybermalevolence"? This whole piece is so stupid I am too distracted to make fun of all the tracking scripts embedded in it. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/10/opinion/nsa-privacy.html …
-
-
This paragraph in particular ("what if China built a MAGIC COMPUTER") should not have been allowed to appear unchallenged in the pages of a serious publication. 'Quantum computing' is something people say when they want to unlock unlimited funding, not a serious threat to anyonepic.twitter.com/gylkDbDidB
Show this thread -
I apologize for yelling into the void about the hapless Privacy Project again, but this is the only way to reach the NYT's Quantum Public Editor, who exists in some branch of the timeline.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
well, there is one kernel of truth there: if quantum computing actually *happens* (this is a big, big IF in my opinion) then all existing encryption gets instantly broken overnight
New conversation -
-
-
it looks like abstract design you plaster on an infamous tech product in the late 80s that's been discontinued a year after launch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.