Here's a question that's been intriguing me a while. What would be the harms of a ban on end-to-end encryption in mass-market products? People feel safe using Gmail and Telegram routinely for sensitive stuff. What argument do you have for E2E for civilians that really resonates?
-
-
For the most part, these institutions *don't* use Gmail. (Particularly not eg. high end law firms.) Which should tell us something.
-
You would be amazed at what high-end law firms do! I am happy to concede this point, however, because it's not really important to the debate. Even the most careful law firms and hospitals don't use E2E messaging.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.