Whatever argument you make for why privacy will collapse if end-to-end encryption is banned has to address the fact that people use Gmail, Slack, Telegram, Facebook, SMS, banks, the IRS and many other non-e2e-encrypted services, and also that privacy collapsed a while ago.
-
-
It's a logical fallacy — begging the question. Law enforcement is asking for backdoors to be mandatory, inferring they are entitled to them, but this admits the opposite. Why don't we frame it the other way around — why must we deliberately weaken already E2E services?
-
I don't think I understand your point
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.