I ask because I think the rhetoric on the "allow exceptional access to law enforcement" side of the debate is far better, and I'm curious what that nerd herd can bring to bear here rhetorically. (Remember on substance I am a true believer, don't burn me on sharpened stake etc.)
I understand. My point is they are happily and successfully used by billions of people every day, without incident. So you can't say "securable backdoors are impossible in practice" without addressing the fact that they exist and are widely deployed
-
-
They are impossible in practice. People just don't understand security. Theoretical and practical feasibility is not something that is democratically decided, they are facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The entire of Kazakhstan has potentially had all their Google Chats read by government since July 17.
-
This is all silly anyway, because law enforcement has no entitlement to a backdoor, and nobody actually needs to give thought to it. So why are we?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.