AG Barr freely mixed the two in his remarks. One is a physical device that gives you retrospective visibility into a person's entire life... but you have to have the device! Another gives you prospective visibility into conversations, and there is no 'tell' if it's being used
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And indefinite message retention policy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We don't want to presume that people are guilty. Mostly because I can't trust that the first amendment would be respected.
-
I don't understand what you're saying about the presumption of guilt
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry to be dense, but why are they dissimilar? Isn't the applied principle (mandated backdoors to serve lawful searches/intercepts) the same?
-
Because physical custody of the device tells you it hasn't been searched. If it is searched, you know (presumably) who searched it. Then you get a new device and are safe again. In the E2E case, you don't know whether anyone is listening, or who it is.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
they are different, but the answer is "no" either way. My computer and phone are extensions of my brain as far as I am concerned, and the 5th applies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.