Here's a question that's been intriguing me a while. What would be the harms of a ban on end-to-end encryption in mass-market products? People feel safe using Gmail and Telegram routinely for sensitive stuff. What argument do you have for E2E for civilians that really resonates?
Rebuttals: - right to privacy has always had limits imposed by law - cost is already being borne by the large tech companies - I don't follow this one - tech will become niche and make it easier to identify criminals, a la TOR
-
-
Those limits are enforced per occasion, not preemptive. The cost of a system protecting ALL sensitive data behind a single point of failure which needs to tension perpetually perfectly secure would be of obscene
-
It's absolutely going to leak or be abused, see what China is already doing See above, not everybody caught well be actual criminals. Also, criminals just have to avoid suspicion under such schemes to get away
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.