(Deleted a tweet that credited the wrong candidate with citing the "Moscow Mitch" jibe.) Back to commercials.
-
Show this thread
-
Closing statements: De Blasio: "This has to be a party that stand for something. This needs to be the party of labor unions. This has to be the party of universal health care." Bennet: Trump doesn't believe in rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.
1 reply 4 retweets 30 likesShow this thread -
Speaking of the judiciary: Two nights of debates, zero questions about the Supreme Court.
8 replies 24 retweets 97 likesShow this thread -
Inslee circles back to making the climate crisis the top priority: "It's time to stand up on our legs and confront the fossil fuel special interests." Gillibrand: "Donald Trump has really torn apart the moral fabric of this country."
2 replies 3 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
Gabbard: "Donald Trump and the warmongering politicians of Washington have failed." Castro: "Donald Trump has not been bashful in his cruelty, and I will not be bashful in my common sense and compassion."
4 replies 5 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
Castro ends with a question of saying "Adiós" to Trump. Sidenote: That's the extent of español for this round of debates. It's a shame that bilingual outreach has been disincentivized by the time-crunch format and media mockery.
1 reply 10 retweets 76 likesShow this thread -
Harris: "We have a predator living in the White House." "The thing about predators is this: They prey on people who they perceive to be weak," she says, adding that "predators are cowards." Sticking to prosecutor messaging, she talks about Trump's "rap sheet."
6 replies 34 retweets 167 likesShow this thread -
Biden: "We choose science over fiction. We choose hope over fear."
2 replies 15 retweets 76 likesShow this thread -
That's it. What questions did not come up during two nights of debates that you would have liked to have been asked?
30 replies 3 retweets 21 likesShow this thread -
Adam Klasfeld Retweeted Christine Muller
The debates appeared to operate upon the tacit assumption, against the evidence of all warnings from the intelligence community, that the upcoming elections will be a fair contest.https://twitter.com/camrola71/status/1156758785651875845?s=21 …
Adam Klasfeld added,
6 replies 35 retweets 109 likesShow this thread
This is a good thing, and does not imply that candidates don't care about the issue. But undercutting public trust in the integrity of elections is inherently destructive to democracy
-
-
Replying to @Pinboard
Very fair point, but lots of folks have election security concerns. Trust not built by sweeping those concerns under the rug.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.