Nitasha Tiku wrote about the remarkable fact that most people who have been vocal organizers at Google have now left the company. There are two kind of opposite ways to interpret thishttps://www.wired.com/story/most-google-walkout-organizers-left-company/ …
-
Show this thread
-
One is the kind of standard story of a large corporation making life uncomfortable for internal dissenters, trying to get them to leave. But there's a second dynamic, in which vocal internal critics of tech companies are a hot commodity. There's not many of them!
1 reply 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
So intentionally or not, being an internal critic puts you on an upward career trajectory. You work at a big tech company, make some noise, and then graduate to a career somewhere else where your ethical stand at the previous employer is a big part of your new identity
2 replies 2 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
Anyone who's tried to organize stuff at tech companies has experienced the shark-like media vortex of journalists hungry for any sign of life in this sector. After the journalists, the NGOs come calling, and various foundations and so on. The tech labor leader is a rara avis.
2 replies 2 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
But this push/pull of resistance within the company, and attractive options outside it, also serve as a pressure relief valve for organizing energy. So Google management benefits from people leaving, the people themselves benefit, but the wider world is left worse off than before
1 reply 2 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I did! But she was right, and I was wrong, about the importance of staying in
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.