The mistake the vulnerability branding people keep making now is not giving them dumb NSA names, like SHININGSODA or VALENCEBALLCAP. It’s always GhostLock or PacketMurder or whatever and nobody is paying attention to those names anymore. But BLUELADDER? That’s a Wikipedia page.
-
Show this thread
-
Similarly, memo to the CVE people: YOU COULD JUST GENERATE AWESOME DUMB NSA NAMES instead of these utterly pointless, opaque CVE numbers. See if that doesn’t get bugs taken more seriously!
12 replies 13 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @tqbf
I think there's a missed sponsorship opportunity here. Wendy's Double Baconator With Cheese Bounds Check Tangy Overflow™. Sev:yum!
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes -
CVE of the Depend Adult Undergarment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
A Supposedly Secure Library I Will Never Patch Again
7:09 PM - 8 May 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.