As a follow-on specifically for Googlers, your company gives Jim Jordan money in your name. It gave him $5000 (the max amount) as recently as 6/26. Why do you tolerate this when you could so easily get it shut down? https://twitter.com/MrFilmkritik/status/1030964018310270976 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Here's the receipt. And this is nowhere near the bottom of the barrel of who Google PAC funds (it's a deep barrel!)pic.twitter.com/XTVrVkq7oy
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
(That image is FEC data in the public domain, so you're welcome to use it in a scathing internal meme)
1 reply 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Here's the tweet I was referencing at the top of the thread, since the owner blocked mepic.twitter.com/5HVdgZTsP6
0 replies 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @orwant
Apple doesn't have a PAC and does fine. Do you think their ideas are not being heard?
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I don't think you can credibly argue that Apple has less of a voice in DC due to a lack of political giving. I would go further and argue that Google's immense influence in DC has little to do with its PAC, and a great deal to do with lobbying efforts and regulatory capture
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.