"Well you see, it's not really kidnapping, their parents shouldn't have..." You take a baby, you take a toddler, you take a seven year old, you drag him away from his mom, he doesn't know what bullshit you tell yourself to sleep at night. He knows he's being KIDNAPPED.
-
Show this thread
-
Banning a kid from hugging? He knows he's being KIDNAPPED by people who MEAN HIM HARM. We're not even dumb enough to do that to prisoners, because prisoners know how to riot.
5 replies 84 retweets 627 likesShow this thread -
And here's the thing. I know this is an administration *built* on the non-obvious benefits of making people angry, *designed* around the sort of performative rage in this very tweet. I know it demonstrates how powerful they must be, if they can ignore dissent this widespread.
1 reply 44 retweets 363 likesShow this thread -
Power is what you take, minus what others take back. The idea in democracy is the more you overstep, the greater the alliance forms against you, and so the easier it becomes to restore normal order. In reality, it only takes the solid support or indifference of a few to win.
2 replies 83 retweets 356 likesShow this thread -
There's an awful lot of people who have decided surely somebody else is going to stop Trump from kidnapping children, that they didn't get where they were today by losing everything "for a good cause".
3 replies 39 retweets 247 likesShow this thread -
And hell, if your guiding belief is "Government is evil", "Look how evil we can make Government" does have some sort of logic to it, doesn't it? Then there's that other logic, "We can do whatever we want, we got away with kidnapping children in broad daylight, didn't we?"
3 replies 60 retweets 269 likesShow this thread -
If you can take enough power quickly enough, our system can't take power back fast enough. Mueller is clearly doing solid work, and is slowly picking off bad actors, but it's not that many Congressmen and Senators needed to flip leadership tomorrow, and they won't. Just not done.
1 reply 30 retweets 201 likesShow this thread -
It's not that banning hugging is "worse" than torturing children to death like the Nazi's did. Evil is not so constrained that it can only operate on a single continuum. It's that it's so damn *creative*. You really have to *think* about how to achieve that level of horror.
4 replies 70 retweets 304 likesShow this thread -
To understand the horror of banning children from hugging, you have to really *get into the mind of a child*, be some fucked up alternate universe Fred Rogers. And then know you'll get away with it. Fucking monsters.
6 replies 59 retweets 294 likesShow this thread -
Fred Rogers. Dolores Umbridge. Jesus. This is how minds work, we encapsulate philosophies in characters who may or may not even have existed. At the end of the day *other people* are characters to all of us, and honestly I can model fictional characters better than real ones.
4 replies 15 retweets 163 likesShow this thread
You in this discussionpic.twitter.com/fHATXkpqnk
-
-
Replying to @Pinboard
You're trying to make some point through a remarkably obtuse metaphor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
I think that somehow via Nazis and JK Rowling you have maneuvered yourself into a rhetorical corner that it would be challenging to tweet one's way free of.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.