I'm currently looking into this; if your channel wasn't in violation of the drug policies of YouTube, I'm pretty sure it's an incorrect termination.
So you’re saying that you can get signed to YouTube partnership even though your channel violates the terms of agreement? Seems a little counter intuitive doesn’t it? So there’s probably examples of YouTube financially backing things like terrorism and they don’t even know it?
-
-
Also, comparing putting a cannabis user (could be mistaken as a cigarette to the ill-informed) into the YPP to putting terrorism groups in the YPP isn't even remotely comparable.
-
How is it not comparable? They wouldn’t know.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Accidents do happen you know.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.