It's unreasonable that the perpetrator has more backing from the law than the victim of the home invasion
-
-
Replying to @chrisptacos1 @kencharlson and
That would be unreasonable if it were true. What are you basing that statement on??
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PierreSimonLap7 @kencharlson and
I base it off the fact the perpetrator had been released 7 times prior to this incident for the same exact thing
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisptacos1 @PierreSimonLap7 and
And that there are countless examples of homeowners and apartment residents getting sued by perps because the perp “tripped and fell” on a piece of carpet while robbing their house. That’s what I’m basing this on. And yes, sadly, this IS true.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kencharlson @chrisptacos1 and
No there are not. Please provide any citations. There are maybe 1 in million cases where the facts are weird or something, but not happening a lot AT ALL. Dare you to prove me wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PierreSimonLap7 @chrisptacos1 and
There’s one. And I can do this all day long. You want more? It’s easy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kencharlson @chrisptacos1 and
Lemme dig into the facts and I'll get back to you. But remember, you said if a perp slipped on a rug the homeowner would be liable. Im looking for something silly like that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PierreSimonLap7 @chrisptacos1 and
We’re pointing out here that a perp is in somebody’s house, gets shot, and then the homeowner is sued and loses. The laws are protecting the perp rather than the homeowner. That’s where this convo started, and that’s what I’m showing here. Happy reading! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kencharlson @chrisptacos1 and
First, the perp didn't win this case. That article is just saying that the trial can go forward. A jury will decide if the homeowner loses. I suspect the only reason it can go forward is because one side is claiming the perp was running away when shot thus unreasonable.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PierreSimonLap7 @chrisptacos1 and
There shouldn’t be a case at all. Remember, the perp tried to kill before he was shot. Here’s another one that a little more fun! Shooting grandpa in the face, but then suing grandpa when he shoots back. Sweet!https://www.cbsnews.com/news/burglar-sues-calif-homeowner-90-who-returned-fire/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If there is not case how do we know the owner isn't lying about everything? Does the phrase "due process" mean anything to you? You prob think a homeowner should be able to keep a perp as a slave if they break in lol
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.