(2/2) "It is an unfair attack on the biggest trial of Ivermectin from the enemies of the drug. I found the Guardian e-mail today in junk mail and I will sue them." Numerous other untruths, mistruths in article. Let Prof defend himself first! Then decide on #1 or #2, yeesh.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hard to assess exactly what went on in the trials definitively at this point but reading the "Jack Lawrence" article clearly shows anti IVM bias and many false claims and it took The Guardian about 8 words into their article to show bias by making IVM "Right Wing"... I'm not..
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you please share the source where Prof. ElGazzar said this? Thank you!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SHAME!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Please can you do an emergency response to this study being retracted. The water is now muddy
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“Email in my junk folder” - The equivalent of “The dog ate my homework.” Opening paragraph plagiarized, data THE AUTHORS PROVIDED unethical and conflicted, numbers changed, patients duplicated… This will take A LOT of explaining. Ivermectin takes a massive hit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Aún garantizando la presunción de inocencia del Prof. ElGazzar pero manteniendo en cuarentena sus estudios hasta aclarar la situación, los datos del resto de los estudios revisados siguen indicando que IVM funciona y es segura
-
Asi es. Pero, como analista de datos, me siento particularmente afectado por esta falta de prolijidad. Hechos como este arruinan el trabajo de todos.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.