The proper claim is that gender is a hierarchical structure/system that ascribes certain roles, etc., to men and women, where these groups are defined by their distinctive biology as that is interpreted through the lens of a patriarchal system.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Biology counts because in a patriarchal society it's the ordering criterion - the basis upon which the gender division is constructed (to the disadvantage of female people - i.e., women). You can't escape the effects of that ordering. It permeates our lives from the world go.
Show this thread -
But the theory isn't essentialist. It's the opposite. There's nothing intrinsic about female biology that prescribes certain kinds of gender roles or relations. The whole point is to bring the edifice of gender, and the hierarchies it entails, crashing down. It's gender critical.
Show this thread -
Now there's a lot complexity and complication in the detail. There are elements of biological essentialism in certain variants of feminism. Nevertheless, if you claim gender critical feminists think biology *determines* gender roles, etc., you have no clue what you're on about.
Show this thread -
I really shouldn't mansplain feminist theory, it's not a good look, I realize, but sometimes I'm overwhelmed by exasperation!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or that they reject it. Feminism has evolved & formed branches. This lot came from the liberal side which was never as strong on women as an oppressed class due to biology as the radical side anyway. With the addition of ideas from intersectionality & queer theory its poles apart
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.