Just stop it. If you haven't read Lyotard's "The Postmodern Condition", and you wouldn't know a grand narrative if it bit you on the nose, pipe down about postmodernism. You're making asses of yourselves.
-
Show this thread
-
The regressive left are way too fond of revealed political truth, and categorical moral certainty, to be accurately labelled as postmodernist. They talk constantly about being on the "right side of history" - which pretty much rules out postmodernism.
0 replies 0 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
In what sense? That truth is situated? You can be a relativist without being a postmodernist...
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
How do postmodernists treat subjective experience? (Intersectional types attempt to derive universal truths from subjective experience. There's no way that's postmodernist...).
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ClaudioDeSat
Sure, but postmodernism is suspicious of truth claims across the board. It's a rejection of modernist certainty. Intersectionality has much more in common with standpoint theory. (The idea one's location in systems of domination/subordination gives privileged access to truth).
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Well, that aspect is more suggestive of postmodernism, but to be properly postmodernist it would have to see claims of identity as being merely a play signifiers, referencing nothing beneath the surface, ephemera if you like. And intersectional types would hate hate that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.