You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Of course, if you define "racism" so that it refers to hierarchical relations between the sexes, people are going to think you're a ninny. But if you define "racism" so that it refers to racially motivated bigotry, then that wouldn't be - or shouldn't be - the case.
So if you see any sociologist claiming the sociological definition of "racism" is prejudice plus power, or something like that, don't believe them. Call them on it. Ask them to specify the sociological authority that polices the correct use of sociological language.
I need to finish this by saying that none of this means that the "prejudice plus power" formulation isn't useful. It is useful. The loathing of a black slave for white people isn't the same thing as white people's loathing of black slaves, for example.
It's just you don't get to tell the sociologist or social psychologist who is using the term "racism" in its normal sense to mean racially motivated bigotry that they are somehow using language wrong. They're not.
Note racism's new definition is used by activists to deny the validity of the old one. Universities and activist communities work in tandem to surreptitiously shift the rules of who can be held to account for racial misconduct, starting with "Its just the sociological definition"
Indeed. It's simply a masked demand for social deference to the preachers
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
