You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Incidentally, this is why the idea free speech is merely the absence of govt interference is trite nonsense. If private institutions - eg, Google, Facebook - dominate the Habermasian public sphere, then being deprived access to their services is a free speech issue.
If it turns out that you can't do things with words unless you have access to social media platforms, then not having access is a limit on your speech. If BLM were banned from Facebook, then that would be a free speech issue. This should be obvious.
Obvious that it's an issue but not so obvious that it's a free speech issue. Might be better to see FS as a narrowly defined negative right. Positive right to access much harder to codify.
I don't tend to think of free speech issues in terms of rights, but not sure it would be hard to codify if one thinks of the big social media platforms as public goods.
Two positive examples, if gov actor allows hecklers veto or selectively charges more money, this is typically a violation of FA rights.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
