Of course, as systems of thought fascism is reprehensible, whereas Marxism is just daft - but as praxis, in the real world, Marxism, in its various guises, has been an utter, immoral disaster.
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @6crip
Yes, that's probably true. But... the history of politics driven by strong notions of collective identity, left and right, is not glorious. If you're on the right, then you need to take that seriously.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @6crip
Yes, the left largely enjoys a political hegemony within academia, the arts, and certain parts of the media. It's regrettable. But I'm a liberal, so collectivism, identity, nationalism - I find them worrying. I don't think they've got a good history.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @6crip
Okay, but if that's true, if you're invoking nationalism in the name of liberal ideals, then you've got to take the pitfalls of nationalism/strong collective identity seriously. Otherwise things might go to hell. There's lots of historical precedent for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
If a Marxist said to you they didn't have to worry about the consequences of a communist revolution, because the world is fucked up anyway, you'd tell them to sod off. Not sure it's unreasonable for a critic of nationalism to worry about outcomes!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.