I've started by trusting system2 (default option!). Then I've read: https://www.edge.org/conversation/steven_pinker-the-false-allure-of-group-selection … It clashes with: A: my understanding of the science (I do know something about it) B: my epistemological stance (big-time!) C: my expectations of what an honest debate should look like 2/n
-
-
Replying to @GraziosiSergio @keithfrankish and
Thus, I've started paying more attention. At the same time I was becoming more aware of many things about stances of the "new atheist" area, in US specifically, with which I used to identify (in GB/IT). 3/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GraziosiSergio @keithfrankish and
Instances of B and C (alarm bells!) became very common. Added with: D: the odd alliance/flirting with anti-Islamic and/or anti-Palestine positions. E: the teaming together of various intellectuals in that area. F: my growing understanding of how much the status quo sucks. 4/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GraziosiSergio @keithfrankish and
Multiply the same pattern enough times, and system2 aligned more and more with system1. Now, I do introspect a lot, so I can talk about it. Many won't. But it's possible that my journey is common. 5/n
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GraziosiSergio @keithfrankish and
What changed for me are 2 things: 1. I know he uses intellectual tricks. At least on occasion, he isn't 100% intellectually honest. 2. I noticed that he never vigorously challenges the status quo, which grants him a ridiculous amount of privilege, see: https://sergiograziosi.wordpress.com/2017/11/19/naive-philosophaster-on-method-and-privilege/ … 6/n
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GraziosiSergio @keithfrankish and
Not only does he not challenge the status quo, he celebrates it (Better Angels). Citing metrics of improvement is fine but it doesn't erase growing inequality, he benefits. Doesn't make him a monster, just your average shitheel. People naturally want to maintain their advantages.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @depistemology @GraziosiSergio and
This is just another version of conservaties are shit people, progressives are much better people. But then I guess people naturally want to maintain their moral advantages...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @GraziosiSergio and
R F Latta Retweeted R F Latta
I'm not making the claim that progressives are much better. This is my thread about how the far right facilitates "progressive" implicit bias thru the Overton window.https://twitter.com/depistemology/status/951793685498417152 …
R F Latta added,
R F Latta @depistemologyTrump is the latest RW iteration of using the Overton window to define acceptable (white male) discourse. Overt racism is cover for "normal" whites to; Complain about PC (Pinker et al) Hold "intelligence" conf abt eugenics at UCL Apologize for pedofilia (skeptics/atheists)Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @depistemology @GraziosiSergio and
You could make precisely the opposite argument. The far Right discourse/action can have the effect of shifting things in the opposite direction. (Certainly happened after WW2, for example.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @GraziosiSergio and
I think that it will eventually have that effect but I hope it doesn't have to entail a holocaust. And it hasn't worked that way for the past thirty years.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Again that's not obviously true. For example, one could see Corbyn's emergence in the UK as a response to austerity, Tories and also moderate Labour Party.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @GraziosiSergio and
Yes, and Bernie Sanders in the US. And many "progressives" in both countries consider them wild eyed radicals. It would be extremely weird and disturbing if there wasn't a backlash from the left to Trump et al. The question is who is enfranchised?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.