Thus, I've started paying more attention. At the same time I was becoming more aware of many things about stances of the "new atheist" area, in US specifically, with which I used to identify (in GB/IT). 3/n
-
-
Really interesting and effectively presented. I know it's not the point, but I wonder what correlation there is between what we think we should do in this or that case and what we actually would do.
-
Thanks! Not very large, I would suspect!

-
I suspect so too -- which makes me much wonder how much value there is our profession's endless analyzing and rationalizing of these intuitions :)
-
Well, it allows one to pull the rug out from people who believe their tribe to be largely virtuous and their opponents' tribe to be largely wicked, so that's got to be good! :)
-
yes -- promoting self-awareness is perhaps the most valuable thing philosophers can do
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It seems the difference in our intuitions between the Envelope and the Sedan cases is that the first is a call on a world-saving altruism, whereas in the second you are 'on-hand' and turning away is a real moral act, in the way that ignoring a call to save the world isn't
-
Kind of... The envelope case has an extremely weak premise (pic). You can never know for sure that your belief is indeed correct, thus, you can always tell yourself it isn't. This allows to conclude that not sending the money might be OK. Sedan cases don't offer the same escape.pic.twitter.com/0s8FDTpDlf
-
IOW, envelope cases (most of them, anyway) require to imagine ourselves to be in an impossible (could never happen) situation. This, IMVHO, makes our intuitions unreliable/uninformative. Could it be part of the explanation?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks, that was an interesting set of cases to explore!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems to me that philosophers allow their thoughts to get in the way of emotions and therefore put too much stock in intellectual morality. Still, most enjoyable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The trouble is, "I behaved badly" is a judgement that belongs to non-utilitarian ethics. The latter is properly focused solely on "what would be for the best"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.