If the university doesn't sack the people interviewing that woman, it no longer deserves to be called a university.
If this hasn't been selectively edited, and perhaps even if it has been, it's absolutely outrageous and disgraceful: https://globalnews.ca/video/3867811/extended-excerpts-from-secretly-recorded-meeting-between-wilfrid-laurier-university-grad-student-and-faculty …
-
-
-
I think people get to fuck things up once or twice before being fired, but a retraction and apology is certainly in order.
-
In the case of that audio, judging by what's on it (so I know nothing about any possible editing) the "defendant" is clearly, incredibly clearly, on the side of a university.
-
Yes absolutely. It's just a question of what happens next, and whether firing people is an appropriate response. I'm a softy.
-
Sure, but to think & talk as her questioners do is not just a matter of oppression, bullying, or silencing of free speech. It indicates quite comprehensive thickness, too.
-
Yeah, I actually started to write a tweet saying that her interlocutors just seemed... well, stupid. But stupidity among university profs is actually surprisingly common!
-
Oh, you don't need to persuade me of that!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.