You haven't touched a nerve. I'm incredulous that you think I think that a Twitter poll is methodologically rigorous.
-
-
-
Replying to @mankinholes
I was barking up the wrong tree. I think you think it wouldn't have suggested that? (Because zero wouldn't have meant anything?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
It would have suggested no such thing except for these 44 respondents. Your survey is meaningless outside of that group. Definitively.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
Well that's not true. (It's not *meaningless*). But so what? It tells you something about the prevalence within that group.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @mankinholes
Hurrah! Exactly my point. And given the narrative of enthusiastic consent that's interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Back to my original point...so what? You seem to be suggesting something more than that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
You keep saying so what? I'm saying, look here's a group of 44 people. More than half have unwanted sex. You say, so what? I don't get it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
You said that if I said it shows nothing then I am wrong. What if only 1 response was given. More meaningful or less meaningful?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If I only got one response? It would result in a very small qualitative study! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.