Now you might say, Ah yes, but it's a self-selecting survey, etc. Well sure, but an entirely "No" response would still have been interesting
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Thank you. We agree. Now all you have to do is figure out why. Your survey is irrelevant to your hypothesis.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
You did see where I called it, "Important self-selecting poll. It's neck & neck. Make your vote count!" Sheesh!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @mankinholes
Yeah, and you should stick to criticizing Twitter poll methodology!


1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
You are normally a lot more precise and coherent. I’m sorry I touched a nerve. But this is BS.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
You haven't touched a nerve. I'm incredulous that you think I think that a Twitter poll is methodologically rigorous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @mankinholes
Then what's problem? In terms of narrative of enthusiastic consent, people having unwanted sex in long-term relationships is interesting.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
A comment completely independent of your survey. You seem to think your survey adds to this somehow. It doesn’t.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So if you were doing qualitative research, and you found your 22 people, you'd say, what? They don't count? I don't understand?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.