What do you mean so what? You think it shows nothing? (Because you're wrong if you do.)
-
-
-
Replying to @mankinholes
It shows that my intuition that a non-trivial percentage of respondents would answer yes was correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
By “respondents” do you mean those exact 44 respondents?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
I'm not claiming it's a representative survey. I have a PhD in sociology. I'm not stupid about research methodology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Good. Because I’m a certified survey research methodologist and your imprecision is concerning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mankinholes
It's Twitter, for god's sake! How much rigour do you want? What do you mean certified? By whom?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
You claimed I was wrong if I thought it meant nothing. It means nothing other than for these precise 44 respondents. So...?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But that's not trivial and uninteresting, regardless of whether it's representative and/or self-selecting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.