What's the logic behind the claim that men particularly are duty bound to "call out" male sexual harassers?
-
Show this thread
-
I'm guessing it's something like sexual harassment is a function of patriarchal society; all men benefit from patriarchy; therefore...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
So it's asymmetrical advantage that means calling out harassers is not supererogatory but rather a matter of duty? Is that it?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Seems reasonable. Something you dislike about it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jbegould
There are certainly problems with it. For example, if sexual harassment is a function of patriarchy, then are individual men culpable?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If they are culpable, then much harder to argue that there's a duty to call them out (because necessary condition seems to be personal).
6:25 PM - 11 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.