Quick thought experiment. Premise: We tend not to rule out *possibility* private acts with no predictable bad results are morally wrong.
Show this thread
-
But if we accept that private acts with no predictable bad consequences can be wrong, then why not certain kinds of thoughts?
Show this thread
What's the difference between screaming racial abuse at a television & fantasizing about murdering the members of a particular racial group?
-
-
Conclusion? Private acts with no predictable bad consequences can't be wrong? Or certain kinds of thoughts can be wrong? Something else?
Show this thread -
I was thinking of the PewDiePie thing. It's a slightly odd thought that what he did was only wrong because it was broadcast.
Show this thread -
But if it would have been wrong even if private, then why not thoughts? His act(s) are probably thought to be indicative of lack of virtue.
Show this thread -
But no reason to suppose that thoughts can't manifest & betray lack of virtue.
Show this thread -
I do tend to the view, for example, that if all your sexual fantasies involve the violent degradation of women, then... morally problematic.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Better out than in? (Like writing an angry abusive email response, then tearing it up and binning it?)
-
Yeah, psychologists have studied these sorts of catharsis arguments (with respect to violent porn, for example).
-
au contraire, the ability to not do the bad action has value even if you've fantasized? Private restraint is practise for public restraint?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.