demonizes large groups of people - e.g., Trump voters, the white working-class -because whether you like it all not polarization and...
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
entrenchment are real political phenomenon (I'd point to the religious wars in Ireland from the 17th century onward as good evidence), and
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
if you want fewer Nazis, rather than more Nazis, you'd better take that into account, and, regardless, the lesson of history, again, is that
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
polarization & entrenchment tend to end badly (if you want an example, there was no particular anti-German sentiment among the British
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
population in early 1914, but by late 1915, it had reached such a fever pitch that it made a WW1 negotiated settlement impossible (and such
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
a settlement was mooted in 1917). d) And finally, I absolutely distrust the motives of people on the left who relish a street battle. If you
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
are willing to hammer people on the head with a heavy bicycle lock, then I don't want you anywhere near political power.
4 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
"Punch Nazis" was the ethical premise of the US's involvement in WWII...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Also, is concern with the ethical strategy or the practical one? Is the postulate "Nazi's ought not be punched"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's a false dichotomy. "Ought not" can (easily) follow if a tactic is counterproductive, because of bad consequences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.