If private companies dominate public sphere (Habermas), their actions have fundamental implications for people's ability to participate...
Imagine Google/Bing (search). Facebook, Twitter, ban any mention of Black Lives Matter on their platforms. Not a free speech issue? Really?
-
-
-
in political & socio-cultural life. That involves issues of free speech, necessarily. If you deprive people of the ability to do things with
-
words, if you render them effectively mute in terms of the wider political culture of a nation, etc., then it's a free speech issue.
-
This is not "free speech absolutism". It's simply to recognize the in modern societies our main political forums are privately owned.
-
Thing is, nobody who cites that stupid XKCD thing really thinks otherwise. If Twitter were to ban all feminists, for example, they would
-
very rapidly, and correctly, complain that feminists were being deprived of their ability to do things with word, deprived of a platform
-
that is fundamental to modern political activism, and that they were in effect being silenced. And, of course, that's a free speech issue.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
But if we don't have the FCC think of the children watching tv /s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.