That's worse. Anything *can* be asserted without evidence (including Hitchens's claim).
-
Poor excuse. One can have a discussion over more than one tweet, you know? Kind of like we’ve been having right now, w you replying 5 times.
It's a perfectly reasonable excuse! We're not really discussing anything. We're talking past each other.
-
-
More specifically: you are not engaging w my criticism that your interpretation is unreasonably narrow. You just repeat your assertion.
-
Right, because I don't think what you think is my interpretation is my interpretation, but I don't want to spend 20 tweets figuring it out!
-
You cld have tried to figure it out in one of your 7 tweets so far, but for some reason you didn’t even try. Which baffles me.
-
Why does it baffle you that somebody wouldn't think Twitter is the best medium for this sort of thing?
-
I think Twitter is for discussions too. Nobody has to agree w that, obviously. If sb just wants to declare his opinions, fine. Just say so.
-
I don't think twitter is good for discussions, actually. Well not complicated discussions. But it's not just that...
-
And yet we’re having one, if only on the meta-topic… :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.