"and probably most people would agree with me about one of them—in each case"... So in what sense are these books overrated?https://twitter.com/prospect_uk/status/892419656455081984 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I suspected the Koran. I suppose if everyone read one or t'other, and all reading one thought the other was over-rated, it would be true.
That's the wriggle room. But if it ends up that a majority of people think both are overrated - then again, it's a curious formulation.
Are you trying to prove that philosophers also don't read very well? Because that's clearly not what Dennett implied.
About what are you talking, Sven?
He implied that followers of each religion would glorify one book and dismiss the other - thus "agreeing" with him on one.
It's broader. He means *non-Muslims* ("most people", not just Xians) would think Koran overrated; and *non-Xians* ("most people")...
OK, yes. But that's not inconsistent with those also being the most influential books, so why is it a "curious formulation"?
But imagine the numbers who have even tried reading both, so have some basis for judging are pretty small.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.