Seems to me that (verbally) "punch up ok, punch down no-no" (and actual threats never ok) is a good, simple, fair and workable rule.
I just fundamentally disagree. I think public figures can be hurt. I think we lose good people because of it. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/06/diane-abbott-bullying-shadow-home-secretary-attacks …
-
-
Yes, there's a tradeoff. I am sure we miss potentially great politicians. OTOH, criticizing power *in any way* is fundamental to democracy.
New conversation -
-
-
I don't see concrete examples here, but the description doesn't sound worse than what HRC or BHO were getting here, or GWB & DJT if you will
-
Well, it's certainly worse in the sense that it's predictable it will have a greater impact than that directed towards Trump, for example.
-
I'm using presidents/candidates as extreme examples, but could find plenty of similar examples a level below, just not sure how...
-
...familiar they'd be internationally (like I didn't know about Abbott).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.