Some data from my "Should You Kill the Fatman?" experiment (http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/fatman/Default.aspx …). 78% willing to torture in ticking bomb scenario.pic.twitter.com/d3eSpnwdJe
-
as a matter of pure consequences it is very difficult to say 'no' in that example.
Right. But the moment you factor in consequences you've got a "wedge" - you need to consider each instance on its merits.
-
-
Absolutely, what I found when looking at how supporters of legalised torture made their case was that they ignored a number of neg conseqs
-
Yup, legalisation moves it into the terrain of rule utilitarianism, and then it becomes much more difficult to conjure justifications.
-
True. Despite that, the last 15 years has seen the most sustained scholarly attack on the absolute prohibition against torture ever seen
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Terrorist groups often need states to react harshly and target innocent people in order to gain recruits & financial support.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.