I suspect gratuitous "grave dancing" is indicative of precisely those characteristics of personality that tend to result in great suffering.
-
-
-
Of course, one must not discount the performative edginess of this sort of thing. It is important to appear radical for all the cool kids!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Can you understand the impulse to be saddened by the death of a famous person you never knew personally but whose work you admired?
-
If that person was no longer actively creating new works, their death is no proximate cause for cessation of benefits derived from them.
-
I don't see how the two situations differ. They seem to be exact mirror images of each other.
-
The two situations differ because being saddened by a death is *not* the same as celebrating a death. Morally, emotionally, different.
-
Mirror images, as I said. Mutatis mutandis. Sadness and joy are symmetrical feelings, aren't they?
-
Rationally, it doesn't make sense that many people felt sad when Harper Lee died. But it's a pretty normal human reaction.
-
Right. But joy/sadness at a person's death or suffering (regardless of whether we know them), aren't *morally* equivalent.
-
That's not obvious. Let's go halfway: are sadness and indifference to a person's death morally equivalent? But we are indifferent to most.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep. I have zero patience for grave dancing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not a great look.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He caused great harm in his life and symbolised a lot of bad things. That his death is rejoiced may be good, as rejoicing is fun.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.