It has to do with the fact it disproportionately benefits those people able to leverage social capital - either for themselves or for others
-
-
-
they deem to be righteous or deserving. If charity is ultimately a zero-sum game this will inevitably hurt those who are in greater need.
-
That is, it'll hurt people who do not have big social media networks, are not articulate, are not the focus of a political campaign, etc.
-
It's charity that benefits the already relatively privileged, at the expense of those who are not as privileged. It's not redistributive, &
-
I think one could make a strong example that it has strong similarities with the Victorian idea that there is a set of deserving poor.
-
If you want to support people in need, vote for political parties that push for income redistribution, socialized health care, etc.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.