There's never been any other relevant kind. Any derisive mention of identity politics reveals naïveté (or intentional misdirection).
Jules Michelet on the seductions and dangers of identity politics. Sort of. Writing in 1855. About the 100 Years War.pic.twitter.com/UmieFSrpiH
-
-
-
Just isn't true. Check out Gramsci's idea of a hegemonic project, for example. Or have a look at the work of Stuart Hall and Martin Jacques.
-
I admit I'm not familiar with it; was it politically relevant and separate from sentiments of belonging to a group?
-
It emphasizes the need to incorporate different interests, tendencies, identities, etc., within an overarching political project.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
my history teacher taught us that the Scots became Scots by deciding they were definitely NOT English :3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.