I don't believe that's true, though it might be true of boundary cases. So, for example, if somebody pops up on national televsion
-
equivalent - was not inciting (particularly if said skinheads then murdered some Asian guy). If I'm right, then you do think there
are contexts where the proposition is truth-apt. It's overwhelmingly those contexts that I'd think should be legislated.
-
-
But I'm not sure there's necessarily much at stake here. I do think legislation is a restriction on free speech, and where the line
-
is drawn will determine the extent to which it's reasonable to say free speech is or isn't a major concern.
-
whether he’s inciting depends on whether there’s an intention to incite, not on the consequences of the utterance
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.