It isn't necessarily misogynistic to prefer a "less qualified" man to a "more qualified" woman in an election (and vice versa, of course).
-
well no, but to prefer a less qualified misogynistic man to a better qualified woman is well suss.
Surely that depends. Suppose the better qualified woman was going to undo Roe vs. Wade?
-
-
exactly - context matters, character matters. Hence it seems legit to make the argument vis a vis Trump/Clinton.
-
Seems suspect to me. Suppose you're pro-life, & think abortion is most important issue. Why would you vote Clinton?
-
don't think it holds for all, but for many certainly: to judge his acts not serious enough to effect choice.
-
Though, of course, it's true sexism is part of the story. But we can get a bit carried away with easy explanations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.