This argument about qualified, experienced woman versus unqualified man is, in and of itself, a bit spurious. If I had a choice between...
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
a qualified, experienced conservative versus an unqualified, inexperienced liberal, then I'm choosing the liberal, because I'm liberal.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Why would I want somebody who might be an effective conservative if I'm not a conservative? That doesn't make sense. Ideology does count.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
It counts for something. But Trump is ideologically unmoored and vastly incompetent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @codytfenwick @PhilosophyExp
Since competence as well as ideology matters, the critique, I believe, is spot on.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @codytfenwick
Lack of competence might prevent you from voting for x. But why on earth would you vote for a competent ideological enemy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
Ask
@davidfrum . There are many, many parts of the job that are ideologically neutral, and simply require skill.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @codytfenwick @PhilosophyExp
And as I implied, Trump's unique lack of clear ideology makes that a much less decisive factor.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Wrong way around. My point is to do with why people might not vote for the competent option (i.e., Clinton).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.