If you think content providers ought to be paid, yet use adblockers, it's time to examine the internal consistency of your belief system.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
can't you disagree with implementations? Ad networks are a very real threat vector
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @florenjust
Sure, but it still means there's no way to pay content providers. If you adblock, then you deprive a site of its income...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
your unquestioned premise is, "ad revenue isthe best way for content providers to be paid". Question yr premise
@florenjust2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgaliel @florenjust
If you're not contributing, don't moan abt people not being paid. None of that stops you suggesting better models.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
who among us is "moaning abt people not being paid"? You're using Trump projection tactics vs honestly engaging
@florenjust1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgaliel @florenjust
Hang on, it's my topic. It's what I'm talking about! Plenty of people moan about content providers not being paid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A subset of those also use adblockers. That's my topic. That's what we were talking abt. The fact you introduced a
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
ability to selectively whitelist consumer-friendly providers offers an alternative to yr binary arg.
@florenjust2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
...ethical issue if you continue to make use of a web site whose adverts you have blocked.
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp
It seems to me that there are a range of possible responses, rather than just two.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.