But knowing somebody might cheat *isn't* same as knowing they have cheated, & latter likely would affect consent
-
-
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @shift_comma3
A reasonable person may argue they *should* know given, for men, there are 2 options & one is more likely?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhiloNatural @shift_comma3
No, no, no! :) Knowledge is justified true belief. You can't *know* something that might not be true!
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @shift_comma3
Doesn't that depend on, again, your definition of justification & I'm not going to mention Gettier...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhiloNatural @shift_comma3
just doesn't make any sense. Anyway, you can't really believe that if you tell your partner that you've cheated,
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
they are going to be placated when you tell them that it's okay because they already knew. They'll tell you they
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
didn't know, there's a big difference between knowing it was a possibility and knowing it's happened, and that
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
you're going to be sleeping on the couch for the foreseeable future. It's that predictable reaction that makes
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
continuing to have sex without telling highly problematic. Because consent isn't informed, and a reasonable...
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
person will conclude that (a) they would want to know; (b) that they'll be pissed off; (c) that it will likely
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
affect their willingness to consent; and (d) that you should know all this! Well that's my view, anyway. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.