I agree. But it does impact the definition of what a reasonable person might need to/already know. @PhilosophyExphttps://twitter.com/shift_comma3/status/764149354458382336 …
-
-
Replying to @PhiloNatural @PhilosophyExp
@shift_comma3 Or be assumed to know.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhiloNatural @shift_comma3
But knowing somebody might cheat *isn't* same as knowing they have cheated, & latter likely would affect consent
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @shift_comma3
A reasonable person may argue they *should* know given, for men, there are 2 options & one is more likely?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhiloNatural @shift_comma3
No, no, no! :) Knowledge is justified true belief. You can't *know* something that might not be true!
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PhilosophyExp @shift_comma3
Doesn't that depend on, again, your definition of justification & I'm not going to mention Gettier...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @PhiloNatural @shift_comma3
No, in this instance, it doesn't. You can't know something to be true when it could be entirely untrue. That...
10:44 AM - 12 Aug 2016
0 replies
1 retweet
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.