I agree. But it does impact the definition of what a reasonable person might need to/already know. @PhilosophyExphttps://twitter.com/shift_comma3/status/764149354458382336 …
-
@shift_comma3 Or be assumed to know.
But knowing somebody might cheat *isn't* same as knowing they have cheated, & latter likely would affect consent
-
-
A reasonable person may argue they *should* know given, for men, there are 2 options & one is more likely?
-
No, no, no! :) Knowledge is justified true belief. You can't *know* something that might not be true!
-
Doesn't that depend on, again, your definition of justification & I'm not going to mention Gettier...
-
just doesn't make any sense. Anyway, you can't really believe that if you tell your partner that you've cheated,
-
they are going to be placated when you tell them that it's okay because they already knew. They'll tell you they
-
didn't know, there's a big difference between knowing it was a possibility and knowing it's happened, and that
-
you're going to be sleeping on the couch for the foreseeable future. It's that predictable reaction that makes
-
continuing to have sex without telling highly problematic. Because consent isn't informed, and a reasonable...
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.